
Religion can certainly help define an area, but as Peirce Lewis notes speaking about Zalinsky, "Here was a man who was willing to go outdoors, use his eyes, and then return to the library and sort through a mass of data to find a match between statistics and landscape" (Wilbur as Icon*). I think this is a good point to think about. In these days of the www, it is imperative to test and "match between statistics and landscape". The illustration at the top is a great visual aid to help map statistics, but in order to really find where this region begins, you have to go there and document everything you see.
Grady Clay's term, "turf" comes to mind when I think of the fieldwork that I have done in Tennessee and West Virginia. Driving through the mountains trying to find a dirt road rumored to be there, in a Land Rover Discovery with New York plates, I discovered what being a stranger in a strange land can feel like. Most of the locals would greet us with a shotgun. On the other hand, it is always a good thing to witness firsthand southern hospitality, which features cuisines that are some of the best I have ever had. And of course a friendly, genuine, courtesy that I have come to define as southern hospitality, which is where I consider the south to begin.
3 comments:
That's a good pair of blog entries, and I agree with you entirely about the first one ... an incredibly ugly piece of news. But the "southernness" piece is, yes, you're right, a lot more uplifting, and the map's always a nice addition to the scene.
Keep looking for those kinds of graphics, and find things that you want to turn to your own purposes; it's a great thing to do in a blog format.
I think the South as a region does not exceed west of the Mississippi River or north of the Mason-Dixon line, however, other characteristics I do agree like religion, food, culture, landscapes expand the south beyond it's Civil War boundaries as related to Zelinsky's piece, mules and horses.
Anything South of New Hampshire is the South.
Post a Comment